Woman in Viral Video Gets Arrested for Assaulting Stepping on Baby

(Natural News) A shocking new study published in the New England Journal of Medicine reveals that when significant women are given covid vaccinations during their first or second trimesters, they suffer an 82% spontaneous abortion rate, killing four out of 5 unborn babies.

This stunning finding, explained below, is self-evident from the data published in a new report entitled, "Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons." Just equally agonizing as the information is the fact that the study authors manifestly sought to deliberately obfuscate the truth about vaccines causing spontaneous abortions by obfuscating numbers in their own calculations.

Originally brought to our attention by a Life Site News article, we checked with our own science contacts to review the information and double check all the math. In doing then, we were able to confirm two things:

1. Yes, the study shows an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions in expectant mothers given covid vaccines during their first or 2nd trimesters.
2. Yes, the study authors either deliberately sought to hide this fact with quack obfuscation (explained below) or they are incompetent and made a glaring error that brings into question their brownie.

In other words, this report was almost certainly a camouflage to try to merits vaccinating pregnant women is perfectly safe. But the study data really bear witness quite the oppose.

Here's how:

700 of the 827 women were vaccinated in the third trimester

Table 4 from the written report, shown below, reveals that a full of 827 pregnant women were studied. Out of the 827 women, 700 of them received their starting time vaccine in their third trimester of pregnancy. This means 127 women (which is 827 – 700) received a vaccine during their commencement or second trimesters. (You have to read the fine impress below the table to meet this disclosure.)

Out of the 127 women receiving vaccines during their commencement or second trimesters, 104 spontaneous abortions occurred before their pregnancies hit the 20-week mark. These are indicated as "spontaneous abortions" in the tabular array.

In simple math, 104 spontaneous abortions (during the showtime 20 weeks) out of 127 women who received vaccines in their kickoff or second trimesters calculates to an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions amongst these significant women who were vaccinated.

It is of import to note that deaths of unborn babies during the third trimester are known as "stillbirths" and non spontaneous abortions. Thus, the spontaneous abortions could not have maybe occurred in women vaccinated during their third trimester, by definition.

Thus, the study authors dishonestly used the wrong denominator of 827 in their "spontaneous abortions" calculation, when they should have used a denominator of 127, which is the number of women receiving vaccines during their first or 2nd trimesters.

Put another way, information technology is impossible for a woman who was vaccinated for the showtime time during her third trimester to accept a "spontaneous abortion" in the get-go 20 weeks, since they weren't vaccinated during the kickoff 20 weeks (and meaning women aren't time travelers). Thus, those women shouldn't be included in the denominator used to calculate the spontaneous ballgame rate.

The authors of this study should receive an award in the category of, "How to lie with statistics," because they apparently tried to pull a sleight-of-hand trick to make it appear that vaccines are condom for pregnant women. In reality, they seem to be killing more 4 out of 5 unborn babies in the first twenty weeks of gestation, at to the lowest degree in this data set up. (It'southward a pocket-size set of 127 meaning women, so we'd like to see a larger review of many thousands of pregnancies in order to get a more clear moving picture.)

Apples and oranges, lemons and limes

A simple way to explain this with a metaphor is to imagine a handbag of 50 lemons and l limes, with a scientific discipline written report asking the question, "What per centum of lemons are yellow?" The scientists count all the yellow fruit and reach the number fifty. They mistakenly carve up 50 into 100 considering at that place are 100 total piece of fruit, then they declare, "fifty% of lemons are yellowish" because it's l/100.

Just the other fifty pieces of fruit can't maybe be included considering they're limes, not lemons. Then the right math is 50/50, which means 100% of the lemons are xanthous. That's the right answer.

In this scientific discipline paper, they are using 827 as the denominator, even when 700 out of those 827 women were only vaccinated in the third trimester, which is long past the time window during which a "spontaneous ballgame" can occur. And since pregnant women aren't time travelers, they can't go dorsum in fourth dimension and report a spontaneous ballgame from months earlier.

If vaccine scientists either can't do this basic math — or are willfully deceiving the earth with dishonest obfuscation of the numbers — then "science" has already failed its core promise: to offer "evidence-based" conclusions to understand the earth around us.

Yet when 4 out of 5 pregnant women lose their babies in the starting time 20 weeks, these scientists falsely claim the spontaneous abortion rate is just 12.6%. Why? Considering they're covering up the atrocities of the vaccine for political reasons, about likely.

In fact, the key writer of the study, Tom T. Shimabukuro, is also named in numerous other studies that claim to document agin reactions in various vaccines, ranging from rotavirus vaccines to the H1N1 vaccine from 2009. It raises the obvious question: Did Shimabukuro make the aforementioned fault in other studies that concluded vaccines posed no significant risk of adverse events? For instance, hither's another report he co-authored: "Adverse events afterwards Fluzone ® Intradermal vaccine reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2011-2013."

That study concluded, "Review of VAERS reports did non place whatsoever new or unexpected prophylactic concerns later on TIV-ID."

Only is that conclusion based on bad math, like the study on covid vaccines given to meaning women? We call for a review of all his methods and conclusions. Peradventure this aforementioned study architect has made the same systematic mistake (or mayhap a deliberate obfuscation) for many years, spanning many previous studies. It wouldn't be the first time ane author was found to have made systematic mistakes across dozens of papers and is forced to retract them.

And isn't that what the "scientific method" demands? Peer review. Double checking the math. Admitting to mistakes in conclusions. This is how science progresses, by pointing out errors and demanding they exist addressed and corrected. We can't just accept bad math and call it "scientific discipline" when the bad math doesn't check out.

Spike protein injections into pregnant women an "atrocity," warns Dr. Peter McCullough

In the hateful time, information technology's articulate that iv out of five pregnancies are being terminated past covid vaccines when those vaccines are given during the kickoff 20 weeks (at least, co-ordinate to the pocket-sized data fix we take and so far). And that means the "depopulation" aspects of the covid vaccine are working exactly as globalists hoped they would.

Think: Bio-distribution studies (pharmacokinetics) show that covid vaccine fasten proteins directly attack reproductive organs such as the ovaries. Given that fasten proteins are engineered biological weapons designed to interfere with human cells, it should exist no surprise whatsoever that they are achieving a high rate of spontaneous abortions in significant women.

I recently interviewed Dr. Peter McCullough, an internal medicine expert and editor of two medical journals. Although he does not characterize this equally a depopulation agenda, he agrees that these vaccines are attacking pregnant women and causing more 80% of unborn babies to be aborted. He calls it an "barbarism" and says the pushing of these vaccines on pregnant women is "shameful." You tin can hear him in his own words in the following interview:

Brighteon.com/fc2aa0fe-eae0-4c32-bc23-47e6b6ab9d97

All this means that live births may plummet past 3.2 million over the side by side year, in the United states alone, if every significant woman is vaccinated during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. The number of unborn babies beingness murdered in the womb, in this case, is reaching "holocaust" levels, which is why this is being chosen a medical "atrocity."

The fields of medicine and science have turned against humanity. They are at present killing babies by the millions and injecting adults with spike protein bioweapons that are causing strokes, heart attacks, deaths and lifelong injury.

The vaccine manufacture is at state of war with the human race. And live-born babies are their enemy. Joe Biden's land management czar in one case characterized human children as an "environmental take a chance."

This is a war. A bioweapons attack. And it goes beyond mere "crimes against humanity." It is a spiritual betrayal of the entire human race by the institutions of scientific discipline and medicine, both of which long pretended to be motivated by a desire to aid humanity, but are at present clearly shown to be working towards humanity's destruction.

Larn more in today'due south mind-opening Situation Update podcast:

Brighteon.com/89677c54-51e3-4139-9af1-093fe160a3a1

Hear a new podcast each weekday at:

https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport

zaratevister1989.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-01-depopulation-alert-shocking-new-study-reveals-covid-vaccine-terminates-4-out-of-5-pregnancies-via-spontaneous-abortions.html